环境规制与中国农业绿色转型: 助力还是阻力?

Environmental regulation and green transformation of agriculture in China: help or resistance?

  • 摘要: 严格且恰当的环境规制是推动农业绿色转型的重要保障。本文基于2005—2022年省级面板数据, 从绿色全要素生产率视角出发, 实证检验环境规制对农业绿色转型的影响, 并重点分析该影响的异质性及其背后的作用机制。研究发现: 1)环境规制对农业绿色转型具有显著的正“U”型影响, 当前绝大多数省份的环境规制强度都未越过促进农业绿色转型的“U”型拐点。2)环境规制主要通过提高绿色技术效率实现整体农业绿色全要素生产率的增长, 并且相较于绿色全要素生产率, 绿色技术效率可以更早突破“U”型拐点。3)机制检验发现, 环境规制可以通过激发农业实质性绿色技术创新的非线性机制和降低农业生产中劳动力要素错配的线性机制, 推动农业绿色转型。4)异质性分析表明, 环境规制对农业绿色转型的非线性影响仅在中西部地区和农业绿色发展水平高的省份显著, 对于东部地区和农业绿色发展水平低的省份均无显著影响。本文建议, 在合理范围内适度加大农业环境规制强度, 尽快完善绿色技术创新导向的环境规制政策, 同时根据不同地区农业面源污染程度和农业绿色发展实际, 因地制宜地制定差异化的环境规制强度。

     

    Abstract: Strict and appropriate environmental regulations are a crucial guarantee for promoting the green transformation of agriculture. In recent years, the Chinese government has stepped up the construction of agricultural environmental regulations in response to increasing agricultural non-point source pollution; however, it remains uncertain whether these regulations can fully realize their intended effects. Using provincial panel data from 2005 to 2022, this paper uses green total factor productivity (TFP) as a measure to assess the degree of agricultural green transition. It empirically examines the impact of environmental regulations on agricultural green transition from the perspective of regulatory intensity, while also exploring the heterogeneity of this impact and its underlying mechanisms. The results show that: 1) Environmental regulation exerts a significant positive “U”-shaped effect on agricultural green transformation; specifically, as the intensity of environmental regulations increases from weak to strong, there is a nonlinear effect on agricultural green TFP — initially inhibiting growth before eventually promoting it. This conclusion holds true after addressing endogeneity concerns and conducting various robustness checks. 2) Calculations indicate that the intensity of environmental regulations in most provinces has not yet crossed the “U” inflection point necessary to promote agricultural green transition, suggesting that policy constraints remain relatively lenient. 3) Environmental regulation enhances overall green TFP growth primarily through improvements in green technical efficiency, and green technical efficiency can surpass the “U” inflection point earlier than green TFP. 4) The mechanism test indicates that environmental regulation promotes agricultural green transformation via both a nonlinear mechanism of stimulating agricultural substantive green technology innovation and a linear mechanism of reducing the misallocation of labor factors within agriculture. 5) The heterogeneity analysis indicates that environmental regulation has a significant positive “U”-shaped impact on agricultural green transformation exclusively in the central and western regions, while its impact is insignificant in the eastern regions. In provinces characterized by medium and high levels of agricultural green development, environmental regulation demonstrates a significant positive “U”-shaped influence on their agricultural green transformation, while the effect is insignificant in provinces with low levels of agricultural green development. The research conclusions of this paper imply the following policy implications. Firstly, it is essential to moderately increase the intensity of agricultural environmental regulations within reasonable limits. This approach aims to force producers to enhance their awareness of green agriculture, actively participate in green production, and reach the turning point of the ‘U’-shaped curve swiftly. Secondly, improve the environmental regulation policy oriented to green technology innovation, so as to encourage and support entities engaged in technological innovation to actively develop green agricultural production technologies, and guide farmers to accept and apply green production technologies, thereby forming a closed cycle of for green technology innovation in agriculture as soon as possible. Finally, the intensity of environmental regulations should be adjusted according to the degree of agricultural non-point source pollution and the actual situation of green agricultural development in different regions. For regions with more severe agricultural non-point source pollution and lower levels of green agricultural development, the intensity of environmental regulations should be increased appropriately. For regions with higher levels of green agricultural development and relatively lighter agricultural non-point source pollution, under the premise of maintaining sufficient regulatory strength to ensure good environmental quality, the intensity of environmental regulations can be appropriately reduced so as not to hinder the agricultural green transition due to excessively high levels of environmental regulation.

     

/

返回文章
返回