Drivers of evapotranspiration increase in the Baiyangdian Catchment

Christine Mushimiyimana, LIU Linlin, YANG Yonghui, LI Huilong, WANG Linna, SHENG Zhuping, Auguste Cesar Itangishaka

MUSHIMIYIMANA C, LIU L L, YANG Y H, LI H L, WANG L N, SHENG Z P, ITANGISHAKA A C. Drivers of evapotranspiration increase in the Baiyangdian Catchment[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2023, 31(4): 598−607. DOI: 10.12357/cjea.20220121
Citation: MUSHIMIYIMANA C, LIU L L, YANG Y H, LI H L, WANG L N, SHENG Z P, ITANGISHAKA A C. Drivers of evapotranspiration increase in the Baiyangdian Catchment[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2023, 31(4): 598−607. DOI: 10.12357/cjea.20220121
ChristineMushimiyimana, 刘林林, 杨永辉, 李会龙, 王林娜, 盛祝平, AugusteCesar Itangishaka. 白洋淀流域蒸散发增加的驱动因素[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2023, 31(4): 598-607. DOI: 10.12357/cjea.20220121
引用本文: ChristineMushimiyimana, 刘林林, 杨永辉, 李会龙, 王林娜, 盛祝平, AugusteCesar Itangishaka. 白洋淀流域蒸散发增加的驱动因素[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2023, 31(4): 598-607. DOI: 10.12357/cjea.20220121

Drivers of evapotranspiration increase in the Baiyangdian Catchment

Funds: This study was financially supported by the Project from the Ministry of Science & Technology of China (2018YFE0110100) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42171046).
More Information

白洋淀流域蒸散发增加的驱动因素

详细信息
  • 中图分类号: P426.2

  • Abstract: The Baiyangdian Catchment is facing a growing shortage of water resources. Identifying the sensitive drivers of evapotranspiration (ET) changes from land and crop management will be critical to understanding the reasons for mountainous runoff reduction and depletion of groundwater resources in the plain. It will also be important for making Xiong’an become a Future Example City for green and sustainable development. In this study, remotely sensed ET data from PML V2 products with a spatial resolution of 500 m was used to analyze the trend of ET at the pixel level and to understand its influence on vegetation such as GPP (Gross Primary Production) and NDVI (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index) under different land-use types for 2002‒2018. Results showed that there was a significant increase in ET in mountain regions and a slight increase in plain regions of the catchment. The spatial pattern of mean annual ET was very much relevant to the changing trend of GPP and NDVI. For the whole catchment, the average increases of ET, GPP, and NDVI were respectively 2.4 mm∙a−1, 9.8 g∙cm−2∙a−1, and 0.0021 at an annual rate. In the mountainous region, changes in annual precipitation and vegetation recovery together caused a total increase of ET by 56.5 mm over the period and negatively affected the runoff. In the plain region, there were 3 factors influencing the change of ET. While intensification of urbanization and reduction in the cultivation of wheat, the water consumptive crop, had both resulted in the decrease of ET and water consumption, ET or water consumption in most irrigated fields increased. Since the beneficial effects from urbanization and crop adjustment were not enough to offset the increase of ET in irrigated fields, an overall ET increase of 6.4 mm over the period was found. In conclusion, both in the mountainous and plain regions, ET increased. And therefore, more efforts are needed to control the ET increase in natural vegetation and cropland for a green and sustainable catchment.
    摘要: 白洋淀流域位于雄安新区上游, 山区植被和下垫面变化、平原区农业灌溉加大了区域蒸散发, 造成山区产流减少和平原区地下水超采。研究区域蒸散发(ET)时空格局的演变趋势、甄别植被、作物种植结构、城市化等对蒸散发变化的影响, 对深入揭示白洋淀流域水资源枯竭的成因, 建设绿色雄安“未来之城”具有重要意义。本研究基于500 m空间分辨率的PML_V2遥感蒸散产品, 从像元尺度分析了2002—2018年研究区ET的变化趋势和显著性, 揭示植被变化、冬小麦压采、城市化等对山区和平原区ET的影响。结果表明, 1)研究时段内白洋淀流域ET和植被总初级生产力(GPP)及归一化植被指数(NDVI)均呈增加趋势, 平均增长量为2.4 mm∙a−1、9.8 g∙cm−2∙a−1和0.0021∙a−1。2)降雨和植被恢复带来的GPP、NDVI增长是山区ET增加的主要因素, ET与GPP和NDVI的趋势变化在空间分布上具有很好的相似性, 研究时段内山区ET增加56.5 mm。3)平原区ET受快速城市化、小麦种植面积压减和农田ET增加3个因素影响, 虽然城市化和小麦压减都带来蒸散发减少, 但仍无法抵消农田ET增加的效果, 平原区ET总体增长了6.4 mm。就整个流域而言, 减少山区植被和灌溉农田带来的ET增加对维持区域水资源可持续利用和绿色发展至关重要。
  • Figure  1.   Location of the Baiyangdian Catchment [ a: map of elevation with meteorological stations; b: map of land use types in 2020; the map is separated into the mountain region (Region Ⅰ) and plain region (Region Ⅱ) by the elevation of 100 m asl]

    Figure  2.   Spatial distribution of annual average evapotranspiration (ET, a), gross primary production (GPP, b), and normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI, c) for the period of 2002–2018 in the Baiyangdian Catchment

    Figure  3.   Variation and trend in annual evapotranspiration (ET) and precipitation (P) in mountain areas (Ⅰ), plain areas (Ⅱ), and the whole catchment (BYD)

    Figure  4.   Trend and significance of Gross Primary Production (GPP) (a) and Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI, b) in mountainous areas (Ⅰ), plain areas (Ⅱ), and the whole catchment (BYD) from 2002 to 2018

    Figure  5.   Temporal trends in evapotranspiration (ET, a), gross primary production (GPP, b), and normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI, c) in Baiyangdian Catchment for the period 2002–2018

    Figure  6.   Temporal trends in monthly evapotranspiration (ET, a), gross primary production (GPP, b), and normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI, c) in the mountain region (Ⅰ), plain region (Ⅱ), and the whole catchment (BYD) for the period 2002–2018

    Figure  7.   Correspondence of evapotranspiration (ET) changes (ET2014–2018 minus ET2002–2006) and Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) changes (NDVI2014–2018 minus NDVI2002–2006) in pixels of the mountainous region (Region Ⅰ, a), urban (b) and cropland (c) in the plain region (Region Ⅱ)

    Figure  8.   Spatial distributions of evapotranspiration (ET trend) changes for summer maize season from June to September (a) and winter wheat growing season from October to May (b) in the plain region for the period 2002–2018

  • AI Z P, WANG Q X, YANG Y H, et al. 2020. Variation of gross primary production, evapotranspiration and water use efficiency for global croplands[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 287: 107935

    ALLEN R G, PEREIRA L S, HOWELL T A, et al. 2011. Evapotranspiration information reporting: I. Factors governing measurement accuracy[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 98(6): 899–920

    ANDERSON M C, ALLEN R G, MORSE A, et al. 2012. Use of Landsat thermal imagery in monitoring evapotranspiration and managing water resources[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2012, 122: 50–65 doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2011.08.025

    BAI Z. 2017. Spatial and temporal changes of agricultural irrigation requirements in the upper reaches of Baiyangdian Lake and its impact on runoff of the mountainous areas[D]. Beijing: University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 1–118

    CHEN C, PARK T, WANG X, et al. 2019. China and India lead in greening of the world through land-use management[J]. Nature Sustainability, 2(2): 122–129

    CHI G Y, SU X S, LYU H, et al. 2022. Prediction and evaluation of groundwater level changes in an over-exploited area of the Baiyangdian Lake Basin, China under the combined influence of climate change and ecological water recharge[J]. Environmental Research, 212(Pt A): 113104

    FENG X, FU B, PIAO S, et al. 2016. Revegetation in China’s Loess Plateau is approaching sustainable water resource limits[J]. Nature Climate Change, 6(11): 1019–1022

    FISHER J B, MELTON F, MIDDLETON E, et al. 2017. The future of evapotranspiration: Global requirements for ecosystem functioning, carbon and climate feedbacks, agricultural management, and water resources[J]. Water Resources Research, 53(4): 2618–2626

    GAN R, ZHANG Y Q, SHI H, et al. 2018. Use of satellite leaf area index estimating evapotranspiration and gross assimilation for Australian ecosystems[J]. Ecohydrology, 11(5): e1974

    GAO Y C, WANG J F, FENG Z M. 2017. Variation trend and response relationship of temperature, precipitation and runoff in Baiyangdian Lake Basin[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2017, 25(4): 467–77

    GRAFTON R Q, WILLIAMS J, PERRY C J, et al. 2018. The paradox of irrigation efficiency[J]. Science, 361(6404): 748–750

    HU S S, LIU C M, ZHENG H X, et al. 2012. Assessing the impacts of climate variability and human activities on streamflow in the water source area of Baiyangdian Lake[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 22(5): 895–905

    HU S S, ZHAO F, ZHANG G Y. Change of rainfall-runoff and its causes in the upper Tang watershed in recent 40 years[J]. South-to-North Water Transfers and Water Science & Technology, 2009, 7(5): 73–75

    JIANG Z Y, YANG Z G, ZHANG S Y, et al. 2020. Revealing the spatio-temporal variability of evapotranspiration and its components based on an improved Shuttleworth-Wallace model in the Yellow River Basin[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 262: 110310

    JUNG M, REICHSTEIN M, CIAIS P, et al. 2010. Recent decline in the global land evapotranspiration trend due to limited moisture supply[J]. Nature, 467(7318): 951–954

    KENDALL G M. 1975. Rank Correlation Measures[M]. London: Charles Griffin

    LEUNING R, ZHANG Y Q, RAJAUD A, et al. 2008. A simple surface conductance model to estimate regional evaporation using MODIS leaf area index and the Penman-Monteith equation[J]. Water Resources Research, 44(10): W10419

    LI C C, ZHANG Y Q, SHEN Y J, et al. 2020. LUCC-driven changes in gross primary production and actual evapotranspiration in Northern China[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 125(6). DOI: 10.1029/2019JD031705

    LI G, ZHANG F M, JING Y S, et al. 2017. Response of evapotranspiration to changes in land use and land cover and climate in China during 2001−2013[J]. The Science of the Total Environment, 596/597: 256–265

    LI H D, WANG A Z, YUAN F H, et al. 2016. Evapotranspiration dynamics over a temperate meadow ecosystem in eastern Inner Mongolia, China[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 75(11): 1–11

    MANN H B. 1945. Nonparametric tests against trend[J]. Econometrica, 13(3): 245

    MOIWO J P, YANG Y H, LI H L, et al. 2010. Impact of water resource exploitation on the hydrology and water storage in Baiyangdian Lake[J]. Hydrological Processes, 2010, 24(21): 3026–3039 doi: 10.1002/hyp.7716

    MUELLER B, SENEVIRATNE S I, JIMENEZ C, et al. 2011. Evaluation of global observations-based evapotranspiration datasets and IPCC AR4 simulations[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 38(6): L06402

    OKI T, KANAE S. 2006. Global hydrological cycles and world water resources[J]. Science, 313(5790): 1068–1072

    PASCOLINI-CAMPBELL M, REAGER J T, CHANDANPURKAR H A, et al. 2021. A 10 per cent increase in global land evapotranspiration from 2003 to 2019[J]. Nature, 593(7860): 543–547

    RODELL M, BEAUDOING H K, L’ECUYER T S, et al. 2015. The observed state of the water cycle in the early twenty-first century[J]. Journal of Climate, 28(21): 8289–8318

    SHERWOOD S, FU Q. 2014. A drier future? [J]. Science, 2014, 343(6172): 737–739 doi: 10.1126/science.1247620

    SOHU NEWS. 2019. The 5th anniversary of the water opening of the middle route of the South-to-North Water Diversion Project[N/OL]. Baoding Evening News, (2019-12-12). https://www.sohu.com/a/359943235_439193

    SUN C, REN L. 2013. Assessment of surface water resources and evapotranspiration in the Haihe River Basin of China using SWAT model[J]. Hydrological Processes, 27(8): 1200–1222

    SUN J M, YU X X, WANG H N, et al. 2018. Effects of forest structure on hydrological processes in China[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 561: 187–199

    TRENBERTH K E, SMITH L, QIAN T T, et al. 2007. Estimates of the global water budget and its annual cycle using observational and model data[J]. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 8(4): 758–769

    VÖRÖSMARTY C J, MCINTYRE P B, GESSNER M O, et al. 2010. Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity[J]. Nature, 467(7315): 555–561

    WANG K, LI H, L, WU A, et al. 2018. An analysis of the evolution of Baiyangdian wetlands in Hebei Province with artificial recharge[J]. Acta Geoscientica Sinica, 39(5): 549–558

    WANG K. 2020. Groundwater resources and wetland sustainability in Xiong’an City[D]. Beijing: Chinese Geology University (Beijing)

    WEGEHENKEL M, JOCHHEIM H, KERSEBAUM K C. 2005. The application of simple methods using remote sensing data for the regional validation of a semidistributed hydrological catchment model[J]. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 30(8/9/10): 575–587

    YANG Y M, YANG Y H, LIU D L, et al. 2014. Regional water balance based on remotely sensed evapotranspiration and irrigation: An assessment of the Haihe Plain, China[J]. Remote Sensing, 6(3): 2514–2533

    YANG Y T, LONG D, SHANG S H. 2013. Remote estimation of terrestrial evapotranspiration without using meteorological data[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 40(12): 3026–3030

    YANG Y, RODERICK M. L, YANG D, et al. 2021. Streamflow stationarity in a changing world[J]. Environmental Research Letters, 16(6): https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac08c1

    ZENG Z Z, PENG L Q, PIAO S L. 2018. Response of terrestrial evapotranspiration to earth’s greening[J]. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 33: 9–25

    ZHANG Y Q, KONG D D, GAN R, et al. 2019. Coupled estimation of 500 m and 8-day resolution global evapotranspiration and gross primary production in 2002-2017[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 222: 165–182

    ZHANG Y Q, LEUNING R, HUTLEY L B, et al. 2010. Using long-term water balances to parameterize surface conductances and calculate evaporation at 0.05° spatial resolution[J]. Water Resources Research, 46(5): W05512

    ZHOU G, WEI X, CHEN X, et al. 2015. Global pattern for the effect of climate and land cover on water yield[J]. Nature Communications, 6: 5918

图(8)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  499
  • HTML全文浏览量:  196
  • PDF下载量:  161
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2022-02-21
  • 录用日期:  2022-09-01
  • 网络出版日期:  2022-09-02
  • 刊出日期:  2023-04-09

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回