张湘, 张仕超, 张煊赟, 刘竞宇, 薛秀峰. “三生空间”视域下近40年长江经济带景观生态安全时空演变及其影响因素[J]. 中国生态农业学报 (中英文), 2023, 31(10): 1539−1552. DOI: 10.12357/cjea.20230138
引用本文: 张湘, 张仕超, 张煊赟, 刘竞宇, 薛秀峰. “三生空间”视域下近40年长江经济带景观生态安全时空演变及其影响因素[J]. 中国生态农业学报 (中英文), 2023, 31(10): 1539−1552. DOI: 10.12357/cjea.20230138
ZHANG X, ZHANG S C, ZHANG X Y, LIU J Y, XUE X F. Spatial and temporal evolution of landscape ecological security and its influencing factors in the Yangtze River Economic Belt from the perspective of production-living-ecological space in the past 40 years[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2023, 31(10): 1539−1552. DOI: 10.12357/cjea.20230138
Citation: ZHANG X, ZHANG S C, ZHANG X Y, LIU J Y, XUE X F. Spatial and temporal evolution of landscape ecological security and its influencing factors in the Yangtze River Economic Belt from the perspective of production-living-ecological space in the past 40 years[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2023, 31(10): 1539−1552. DOI: 10.12357/cjea.20230138

“三生空间”视域下近40年长江经济带景观生态安全时空演变及其影响因素

Spatial and temporal evolution of landscape ecological security and its influencing factors in the Yangtze River Economic Belt from the perspective of production-living-ecological space in the past 40 years

  • 摘要: 长江经济带是生态文明建设先行示范带, 其“生产-生活-生态”空间(三生空间)时空格局对长江经济带景观生态安全和人类福祉产生了深刻影响。本文基于1980年、1990年、2010年、2020年土地利用遥感监测数据, 考虑三生空间与土地利用类型的对应关系, 运用景观生态安全评价模型、空间自相关分析等方法分析1980—2020年长江经济带三生空间的景观生态安全时空演变特征, 运用地理探测器从自然条件、社会经济、土地利用等方面探索其变化的影响机制。结果表明: 1) 1980—2020年长江经济带三生空间以生态空间为主, 占三生空间总面积的66%以上, 且以生产空间与生态空间、生产空间与生活空间之间的相互转换为主。2) 1980—2020年长江经济带三生空间景观生态安全水平整体呈上升趋势。其中, 生产空间不安全区面积占比先减少后微增; 生活空间不安全区面积占比呈逐年下降趋势, 中等安全区与较安全区面积占比呈增加趋势; 生态空间较安全区与安全区面积占比呈波动上升趋势。3)长江经济带三生空间景观生态安全空间分异显著。其中生产空间、生活空间安全区主要分布在长江经济带三大城市群, 而生态空间安全区集中于长江中上游山区、赣南与浙南等地区。4)长江经济带三生空间景观生态安全空间格局分布较稳定, 但是内部区域差异比较明显。其中高-高聚集区主要分布在川西、滇西、贵鄂湘赣部分地区以及浙南地区, 而低-低聚集区主要分布于长江经济带三大城市群。5)土地利用对三生空间景观生态安全格局演变影响最为显著, 社会经济与自然条件影响力次之。因此应优化三生空间布局, 以促进三生空间景观生态功能协同发挥, 提升景观生态安全水平, 推进长江经济带生态文明建设与可持续发展。

     

    Abstract: The Yangtze River Economic Belt is the leading demonstration belt for ecological civilization construction, and its spatial and temporal pattern of production-living-ecological space profoundly impacts landscape ecology security and people’s blessedness. Based on the remote sensing monitoring data of land use in 1980, 1990, 2010, and 2020, and considering the corresponding relationship between production-living-ecological space and land use types, this study analyzed the spatial-temporal evolution characteristics of landscape ecology security in the Yangtze River Economic Belt from 1980 to 2020 by using a landscape ecology security assessment model, spatial autocorrelation analysis, and other methods. And the geographic detectors was usted to explore the impact mechanisms of changes in natural conditions, social economy, and land use. The results showed that: 1) from 1980 to 2020, the land space of the Yangtze River Economic Belt was mainly ecological space, followed by production space and living space. The mutual conversion between production space and ecological space, and production space and living space, were dominant. 2) The overall landscape ecology security level of the production-living-ecological space in the Yangtze River Economic Belt from 1980 to 2020 showed an increasing trend. Among them, the unsafe zones of production space first decreased and then increased slightly; the unsafe zones of living space decreased year by year, whereas the moderately safe zones and safer zones expanded, and the safer zones of ecological space showed a fluctuating upward trend. 3) The spatial differentiation of landscape ecology security in the Yangtze River Economic Belt was clear. Among them, the safe zones of production space and living space were mainly distributed in the three major urban clusters in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, whereas the safe zones of ecological space were concentrated in the mountainous areas in the middle and upper reaches of the Yangtze River, southern Jiangxi and southern Zhejiang. 4) The spatial pattern of landscape ecology security of the production-living-ecological space in the Yangtze River Economic Belt was relatively stable, but the internal regional differences were evident. The high-high aggregation areas were mainly distributed in western Sichuan, western Yunnan, parts of Guizhou, Hubei, Hunan, Jiangxi, and southern Zhejiang, whereas the low-low aggregation areas were mainly distributed in the three major urban agglomerations in the Yangtze River Economic Belt. 5) Land use significantly impacted the evolution of landscape ecology security patterns, followed by the social economy and natural conditions. Therefore, we should pay attention to optimizing the layout of the production-living-ecological space to improve the coordinated play of landscape ecology functions and promote the ecological civilization construction and sustainable development of the Yangtze River Economic Belt.

     

/

返回文章
返回