基于全排列多边形图示指标法的土壤肥力质量评价
Evaluation of the quality of soil fertility using entire-array-polygon indicator method
-
摘要: 土壤对于植物生长和土地生产力极其重要, 了解和掌握土壤肥力质量有助于认识土壤环境状况, 并有效和合理地利用土地。当前, 土壤肥力质量评价有许多种方法。本研究将全排列多边形图示指标方法引入土壤肥力质量评价, 并以吉林省黑土为例, 从土壤养分、结构和环境3方面建立评价指标体系和分级标准, 将具有代表性的13个野外定点采样的测试数据进行评价, 同时与可拓评价法、改进的人工神经网络法的评价结果进行对比分析, 验证了本方法的可行性。结果表明: 研究区内选取的13个样点, 肥力质量均为Ⅲ类级别, 肥力质量中等; 针对不同样点所存在的限制因素, 可提出土壤改良与改善的对策, G3、G7和G8样点的土壤需要增施磷肥, G4、G10和G14样点的土壤应注意耕作制度和改良土壤结构。与其他评价方法比较发现, 全排列多边形图示指标法用于土壤肥力质量评价是可行的, 评价结果一致性高, 仅在3个或1个样点的评价结果不一致。全排列多边形图示指标法简便易懂, 方便编程实现参评因子量化处理, 避免主观随意性。此方法是土壤肥力质量评价的新方法, 可为其他地区或土壤类型的土壤肥力质量评价提供一定的参考价值。Abstract: Soil is extremely important for plant growth and land productivity. A good understanding of the soil fertility quality is helpful to clearly learn soil environment condition, and it also contributes to effectively and rationally use of land resources. Currently, there are many methods evaluating soil fertility quality and assessing the condition of soil environment. However, due to subjective experience influencing on indicator weight decision, the results of these evaluation methods are more or less deviation from actual situation. And the results are usually not visualized. In this study, a new method — entire-array-polygon graphical representation and indicator method, a method used in eco-city evaluation, was used to evaluate soil fertility quality. The feasibility of the entire-array-polygon indicator method was also verified. A black soil in Jilin Province was used to establish both the evaluation indicator system and classification standard from three aspects — soil nutrient, soil structure and soil environment. The study evaluated a representative test data taken from 13 field sampling points in black soil fields in Jilin Province. The evaluation results of the entire-array-polygon indicator method were compared with the results of extenic method and improved artificial neural network method. The results clearly showed that soil fertility quality at the 13 sampling points in the study area was level III and the soil quality belonged to moderate grade. The study also advanced soil improvement measures based on the limiting factors of different sampling points. Sampling points G3, G7 and G8 needed more phosphor fertilizer, points G4, G10 and G14 needed more attention in terms of cropping systems and improvement of soil structure. The results of comparison with other evaluation methods indicated that the entire-array-polygon method was feasible for evaluating soil fertility quality. The evaluation results were highly consistent with those of other methods, with different evaluation results for only 1 to 3 sampling points. The entire-array-polygon indicator method was visual and easy to understand and convenient to quantify in terms of programming evaluation factors and avoiding subjective and arbitrary. It proved to be a new and useful method for evaluating soil fertility quality and provided a reference for application in other regions or soil types for assessing soil fertility quality.