我国主产棉区棉花纤维品质性状的区域分布特征
Regional distribution characteristics of cotton fiber quality in main cotton production areas in China
-
摘要: 我国主产棉区及其亚区的棉纤维品质区域特征明显, 适时评价各棉区的纤维品质发展现状有助于稳定优势棉花产区和促进特色棉花产区的发展。本研究采用GGE双标图分析了2011—2015年全国棉花品种区域试验中各亚区环境与纤维品质性状的互作模式, 分析比较了各主产棉区和亚区的纤维品质特征。结果表明: 1)在主产棉区尺度上, 长江流域棉区纤维长度和比强度最好, 并且都达到了国家棉花品种审定的Ⅱ级标准, 而马克隆值和纺纱均匀性指数居中; 黄河流域棉区的纤维长度和比强度较好, 但马克隆值偏高; 西北内陆棉区的马克隆值和纺纱均匀性指数表现最好, 纤维长度和马克隆值达到了国家棉花品种审定的Ⅱ级标准, 但比强度在三大棉区中表现最差。2)在棉花亚区尺度上, 纤维长度表现以长江下游和长江上游亚区为最好, 黄土高原亚区稍差, 其余亚区表现较好; 比强度表现以长江下游、长江中游、淮北平原、南襄盆地和黄土高原最好, 而南疆棉区、长江上游和北疆棉区比强度稍差; 马克隆值以北疆棉区、南疆棉区和长江上游表现最好, 而黄土高原、淮北平原、长江中游和华北平原的马克隆值偏高。3)在纤维品质的综合表现上, 北疆棉区、长江下游、长江上游和南疆棉区的纤维品质综合表现最好, 淮北平原、长江中游和南襄盆地次之, 华北平原和黄土高原稍差。本研究展示了GGE双标图的“环境性状”功能图在纤维品质区域特征评价方面的应用效果, 可为我国棉花优势产区发展和棉纺企业合理用棉提供理论依据, 也对全国棉花纤维品质生态区划分具有指导意义。Abstract: The significant regional differences in cotton fiber characteristics have been well recognized in not only traditional main cotton production areas, but also in the corresponding subregions in China. The evaluation of cotton fiber quality characteristics in each cotton production region is obviously benefical for understanding current developing conditions of cotton fiber quality. This can contribute to the intensification of superior cotton production areas and the development of cotton production areas with special fiber qualtiy characteristics. The GGE biplot experimental design was used to explore the interaction pattern between subregional environments of cotton and cotton fiber quality traits in three main cotton production areas (Changjiang River Valley, Huanghe River Valley and Northwest Inland) and their subregions. Data for the study were collected from the national cotton regional trials during the period 2011–2015. The results indicated that: 1) at main cotton production area scale, fiber length and strength in Changjiang River Valley (CRV) performed the best in the three main cotton production areas. Although all of these areas reached the Class II level of national cotton variety registration standard, there were medium performances for micronaire value and spinning consistency index. Fiber length and strength for the Huanghe River Valley (HRV) were better, while micronaire value was higher than desirable. On the other hand, micronaire value and spinning consistency index were best for the Northwest Inland cotton production area. Both fiber length and micronaire value reached Class II level of national cotton variety registration standard, although fiber strength was the lowest in the three main cotton production areas. 2) For subregions within three main cotton production areas, fiber length was the highest in the lower and upper reaches of CRV, slightly poor in the Loess Plateau region and relatively good in other subregions. Strength performed well in the middle and lower reaches of CRV, Huaibei Plain, Nanxiang Basin and the Loess Plateau. It was relatively poor in the upper reaches of CRV and the Northwest Inland regions. Conversely, micronaire value performed ideally in the upper reaches of CRV and the Northwest Inland regions, but not so satisfactory in the subregions of the Loess Plateau, Huaibei Plain, North China Plain and the lower reaches of CRV. 3) For comprehensive fiber quality trait performance, the upper and lower reaches of CRV and the Northwest Inland regions were the most ideal subregions, followed by Huaibei Plain, Nanxiang Basin and the middle reaches of CRV. Then the North China Plain and the Loess Plateau were less satisfactory in terms of comprehensive fiber quality trait performance. This study demonstrated the effectiveness of “environment vs. trait” biplot in evaluating ecological regionalization of cotton fiber quality. It also provided a reference for the prioritization of development of high-quality cotton production areas and raw cotton selection strategy for the textile industry and also set the guidlines for further ecological regionalization of cotton fiber quality in China.