Interaction effects of mid-season hybrid rice varieties and meteorological factors on rice quality in South Sichuan winter paddy fields
-
摘要: 为了改善大面积生产的水稻稻米品质,2015年和2016年以杂交中稻优质稻品种‘旌优127’、高产品种‘Ⅱ优602’为材料,通过分期播种并设置高氮低密与低氮高密两种栽培方式,研究了杂交中稻品种、气候及栽培方式互作对稻米品质的影响。结果表明,随着播种期推迟,整精米率、长宽比呈升高趋势,垩白度、胶稠度呈下降趋势,垩白粒率则呈"V"字型变化;高氮低密与低氮高密两个栽培方式间稻米品质差异不显著,栽培方式与年度、品种、播种期对稻米品质的互作效应均不显著;整精米率、垩白度、垩白粒率、长宽比同时受年度、播种期和品种的互作效应显著,胶稠度在年度和品种间互作效应显著,直链淀粉含量在播种期和品种间互作效应显著。对稻米品质影响程度的降序排列是品种、气候、栽培方式。有利于提高稻米品质的气象条件为:播种-移栽相对湿度小、日平均气温高,移栽-拔节期日平均气温低、日照时数少,拔节-齐穗期日最高气温低、日最低气温高、日均相对湿度低,齐穗-成熟期日照时数少。水稻抽穗前的气象因子通过改变穗粒结构而间接影响米质,抽穗后温度升高引起籽粒灌浆速度加快致稻米品质下降。Abstract: In order to improve rice quality for large-scale rice production, a field experiment on mid-season hybrid rice varieties of 'ⅡY602' (high yield variety) and 'JY127' (high quality variety) was conducted in 2015-2016 under two cultivation methods[HNLD, high N and low density (pure nitrogen 210 kg·hm-2, 90 000 points·hm-2); LNHD:low N and high density (pure nitrogen 105 kg·hm-2, 180 000 points·hm-2)] in 5 sowing dates (5 March, 25 March, 20 April, 4 May, 24 May). The experiment aimed at to clarify the effects of meteorological factors at different growth stages on quality of different rice varieties under different cultivation measures. The experimental results showed that with delayed seeding time, head rice rate and length to width ratio increased; chalkiness, gel consistency decreased; and chalky grain rate in "V" type changed. There were no significant difference between two cultivation methods of high N and low density and low N and high density in all rice quality indexes and no interaction effects of rice cultivation modes, variety and seeding time. There were significant interaction effects of year, seeding time and rice variety on head rice rate, chalkiness, chalky grain rate and length-to-width ratio. Significant interaction effects were also observed between year and rice varieties in gel consistency and between seeding time and rice variety in amylose content. The descending order of influence on rice quality was:variety, climate and planting mode. Meteorological conditions required to improve rice quality included small relative humidity, high daily average temperature for the period from sowing and transplanting; low average temperature, less sunshine hours from transplanting to jointing; low daily highest temperature, high daily minimum temperature and low daily average relative humidity for the period from jointing to full-heading; and less sunshine hours for the period from full-heading to mature. The meteorological factors indirectly impacted rice quality through changing grain structure before heading in hybrid rice. High temperature after grain-filling reduced rice quality. The study provided scientific basis for high-quality rice cultivation.
-
Keywords:
- Mid-season hybrid rice /
- Variety /
- Meteorological factor /
- Cultivation method /
- Rice quality
-
表 1 品种、播种期及栽培方式对稻米品质影响及其方差分析
Table 1 Effects of variety, seeding time and cultivation way on rice quality and their variance analysis
项目Item 整精米率Head rice rate (y1) (%) 垩白度Chalkiness (y2) (%) 垩白粒率Chalky grain rate (y3) (%) 长宽比Length-width ratio (y4) 胶稠度Gel consistency (y5) (mm) 直链淀粉含量Amylose content (y6) (%) 最小值Min. 8.00 0.10 2.00 2.20 38.00 12.90 最大值Max. 58.80 41.80 74.00 3.70 82.00 22.00 平均值Mean 37.07 8.84 32.13 2.89 62.78 17.57 CV (%) 48.32 111.96 71.56 18.84 24.52 20.12 年度Year 2015 53.31±2.71a 5.61±0.35b 27.30±1.82b 2.86±0.09b 66.60±2.27a 18.30±1.21a 2016 20.84±0.79b 12.07±0.24a 36.95±2.01a 2.92±0.07a 58.95±2.04b 16.85±1.08b 播种期(月-日) Seeding time (month-day) 03-05 31.70±1.32b 13.81±0.78a 35.75±1.97a 2.79±0.04b 65.88±2.70a 17.55±1.32a 03-25 31.34±1.08b 7.71±0.29b 31.94±1.68abc 2.86±0.08ab 66.13±2.91a 17.39±1.05a 04-20 38.94±1.55a 5.71±0.27b 28.81±1.22c 2.86±0.06ab 62.00±1.83ab 17.39±1.15a 05-04 40.86±1.39a 9.09±0.20b 31.06±1.66bc 2.99±0.07a 62.69±2.07ab 17.65±1.27a 05-24 42.53±2.12a 7.86±0.49b 33.06±2.39ab 2.95±0.10a 57.19±2.23b 17.88±1.10a 栽培方式Cultivation way 高氮低密HNLD 37.47±1.84a 8.66±0.54a 32.28±1.48a 2.90±0.04a 62.03±2.96a 17.53±1.36a 低氮高密LNHD 36.68±1.90a 9.02±0.67a 31.98±1.19a 2.88±0.06a 63.53±2.17a 17.61±1.40a 品种Variety 旌优127 JY127 37.04±1.47a 1.93±0.31b 12.00±1.65b 3.42±0.08a 76.35±2.77a 14.19±1.14b Ⅱ优602 ⅡY602 37.11±0.98a 15.75±0.34a 52.25±1.41a 2.37±0.05b 49.20±2.04b 20.96±1.08a 方差分析(F值)
F value for variance analysis年度Year (A) 1 188.33** 99.44** 298.59** 10.29* 70.59** 327.88** 播种期Seeding time (B) 24.65** 17.56** 16.77** 14.36** 12.70* 5.19 栽培方式Cultivation way (C) 0.71 0.32 0.29 1.14 2.71 1.00 品种Variety (D) 0.00 456.16** 5 194.59** 3 150.00** 889.10** 7 147.44** A × B 3.96 14.52** 112.88** 2.79 2.75 4.16 A × C 0.01 0.25 2.05 0.00 3.09 1.26 A × D 0.06 82.10** 251.13** 2.57 34.52** 0.06 B × C 0.74 0.47 2.50 3.29 2.51 0.77 B × D 7.07* 20.54** 59.40** 3.93 1.10 12.96** C × D 1.09 1.29 2.05 0.29 0.05 3.51 A × B × C 0.40 0.64 2.42 0.71 2.57 1.43 A × B × D 16.78** 12.10** 15.10** 5.79* 4.14 2.27 A × C × D 0.20 2.76 5.42 0.29 3.49 0.25 B × C × D 0.51 0.53 3.93 2.43 1.08 1.84 高氮低密:施纯氮210 kg·hm-2、9万穴·hm-2; 低氮高密:施纯氮105 kg·hm-2, 18万穴·hm-2。同列不同小写字母表示不同处理间差异显著(P < 0.05)。*和**表示处理间在0.05和0.01水平上差异显著。HNLD: high N and low density (pure nitrogen 210 kg·hm-2, 90 000 points·hm-2); LNHD: low N and high density (pure nitrogen 105 kg·hm-2, 180 000 points·hm-2). Different lowercase letters in the same column mean significant differences at 0.05 level. * and ** mean significantly differences at 0.05 and 0.01 levels, respectively. 表 2 2015年和2016年各试验处理下两水稻品种关键生育期的日期(月-日)
Table 2 Date (month-day) of key growth stages under different cultivation mode and seeding time treatments of two rice varieties in 2015 and 2016
播种期Seeding time (month-day) 栽培方式Cultivation mode 品种Variety 2015 2016 移栽期Transplanting time 拔节期Jointing stage 齐穗期Full heading stage 成熟期Maturity 移栽期Transplanting time 拔节期Jointing stage 齐穗期Full heading stage 成熟期Maturity 03-05 高氮低密
HNLD旌优127
JY12704-06 05-24 06-24 07-27 04-09 05-24 07-01 07-29 Ⅱ优602
ⅡY60204-06 06-06 07-04 08-03 04-09 05-28 07-04 08-01 低氮高密
LNHD旌优127
JY12704-06 05-24 06-25 07-28 04-09 05-21 06-29 07-28 Ⅱ优602
ⅡY60204-06 06-05 07-05 08-05 04-09 05-26 07-03 07-31 03-25 高氮低密
HNLD旌优127
JY12704-27 06-05 07-06 08-07 04-18 06-10 07-11 08-13 Ⅱ优602
ⅡY60204-27 06-18 07-19 08-15 04-18 06-15 07-18 08-15 低氮高密
LNHD旌优127
JY12704-27 06-05 07-07 08-07 04-18 06-14 07-14 08-14 Ⅱ优602
ⅡY60204-27 06-18 07-20 08-17 04-18 06-17 07-20 08-16 04-20 高氮低密
HNLD旌优127
JY12705-21 06-27 07-27 08-25 05-18 06-29 07-31 08-24 Ⅱ优602
ⅡY60205-21 07-02 08-03 08-30 05-18 06-30 08-04 08-30 低氮高密
LNHD旌优127
JY12705-21 06-26 07-26 08-26 05-18 06-25 07-27 08-22 Ⅱ优602
ⅡY60205-21 07-02 08-03 08-30 05-18 06-30 08-02 08-29 05-04 高氮低密
HNLD旌优127
JY12705-26 07-01 08-03 09-02 05-26 07-11 08-06 09-02 Ⅱ优602
ⅡY60205-26 07-08 08-10 09-08 05-26 07-15 08-12 09-08 低氮高密
LNHD旌优127
JY12705-26 07-01 08-02 09-03 05-26 07-11 08-06 09-02 Ⅱ优602
ⅡY60205-26 07-09 08-09 09-10 05-26 07-15 08-12 09-08 05-24 高氮低密
HNLD旌优127
JY12706-13 07-20 08-21 09-23 06-14 07-16 08-19 09-21 Ⅱ优602
ⅡY60206-13 07-25 08-28 09-28 06-14 07-20 08-21 09-25 低氮高密
LNHD旌优127
JY12706-13 07-21 08-21 09-23 06-14 07-15 08-17 09-20 Ⅱ优602
ⅡY60206-13 07-28 08-28 09-29 06-14 07-19 08-21 09-24 高氮低密:施纯氮210 kg·hm-2、9万穴·hm-2; 低氮高密:施纯氮105 kg·hm-2, 18万穴·hm-2。HNLD: high N and low density (pure nitrogen 210 kg·hm-2, 90 000 points·hm-2); LNHD: low N and high density (pure nitrogen 105 kg·hm-2, 180 000 points·hm-2). 表 3 两个水稻品种在不同播种期下各生育期的气候因素(2015年)
Table 3 Climate factors of different growth stages for two rice varieties under different sowing times (2015)
气候因素
Climate factor播种期
Sowing time (month-day)旌优127 JY127 Ⅱ优602 ⅡY602 播种-移栽ST 移栽-拔节TJS 拔节-齐穗JSFS 齐穗-成熟FSM 播种-移栽ST 移栽-拔节TJS 拔节-齐穗JSFS 齐穗-成熟FSM 日最高气温
Daily maximum temperature
(℃)X1 X2 X3 X4 X1 X2 X3 X4 03-05 22.55 26.09 28.71 31.59 22.55 26.40 29.39 33.45 03-25 24.75 28.10 29.15 33.77 24.75 28.37 30.86 32.94 04-20 27.43 28.87 31.45 31.73 27.43 28.92 32.83 30.14 05-04 27.64 29.43 32.16 30.31 27.64 29.13 33.13 30.21 05-24 28.40 30.74 32.13 27.69 28.40 31.03 31.42 26.75 日最低气温
Daily minimum temperature
(℃)X5 X6 X7 X8 X5 X6 X7 X8 03-05 13.98 17.52 21.98 23.58 13.98 18.39 22.91 23.93 03-25 15.86 20.11 22.65 24.12 15.86 20.56 23.30 24.29 04-20 18.62 22.03 23.40 23.74 18.62 22.64 23.72 22.98 05-04 19.70 22.64 23.71 22.98 19.70 22.34 23.89 23.16 05-24 21.50 23.20 23.95 21.80 21.50 23.29 23.67 21.28 日平均气温
Average daily temperature
(℃)X9 X10 X11 X12 X9 X10 X11 X12 03-05 17.76 21.22 24.66 26.92 17.76 21.81 25.46 27.95 03-25 19.55 23.43 25.23 28.16 19.55 23.76 26.42 27.85 04-20 22.35 24.76 27.53 26.90 22.35 24.95 28.26 25.70 05-04 23.11 25.33 28.14 25.81 23.11 25.08 28.55 25.83 05-24 24.26 26.31 27.95 23.99 24.26 26.83 26.92 23.36 降水量
Precipitation
(mm)X13 X14 X15 X16 X13 X14 X15 X16 03-05 73.6 103.9 70.5 380.5 73.6 125.5 151.6 279.1 03-25 86.6 114.7 159.0 298.6 86.6 124.4 280.9 209.1 04-20 60.7 99.5 378.9 150.5 60.7 175.3 308.0 161.5 05-04 65.4 133.9 317.7 161.5 65.4 174.1 354.4 167.9 05-24 45.3 286.2 253.9 283.3 45.3 405.7 166.4 275.0 日平均相对湿度
Daily average relative humidity
(%)X17 X18 X19 X20 X17 X18 X19 X20 03-05 76.2 72.8 76.3 83.0 76.2 76.0 85.0 79.0 03-25 75.7 77.5 85.2 75.6 75.7 78.4 83.0 78.7 04-20 70.3 83.4 79.0 80.2 70.3 83.8 78.9 81.7 05-04 75.2 83.8 79.2 81.3 75.2 84.0 75.3 84.3 05-24 82.5 82.3 78.7 86.3 82.5 82.3 80.3 89.0 日照时数
Sunshine duration
(h)X21 X22 X23 X24 X21 X22 X23 X24 03-05 128.3 262.0 83.5 208.6 128.3 295.6 91.1 211.3 03-25 171.5 164.6 101.6 226.8 171.5 200.1 161.5 172.2 04-20 163.3 103.8 182.5 159.5 163.3 127.2 221.9 127.4 05-04 99.6 106.0 227.2 138.3 99.6 143.0 235.8 107.2 05-24 62.1 180.9 196.1 171.1 62.1 221.0 182.2 145.8 ST: from sowing to transplanting; TJS: from transplanting to jointing stage; JSFS: from jointing stage to full heading stage; FSM: from full heading stage to maturity. 表 4 两个水稻品种在不同播种期下的气候因素(2016年)
Table 4 Climate factors of different growth stages for two rice varieties under different sowing times (2016)
气候因素
Climate factor播种期
Sowing time (month-day)旌优127 JY127 Ⅱ优602 ⅡY602 播种-移栽ST 移栽-拔节TJS 拔节-齐穗JSFS 齐穗-成熟FSM 播种-移栽ST 移栽-拔节TJS 拔节-齐穗JSFS 齐穗-成熟FSM 日最高气温
Daily maximum temperature
(℃)X1 X2 X3 X4 X1 X2 X3 X4 03-05 20.30 25.55 29.53 33.50 20.73 25.48 30.31 33.79 03-25 23.23 26.94 31.47 33.57 23.23 27.16 31.78 34.15 04-20 25.94 28.84 33.30 34.66 25.94 28.94 33.63 34.22 05-04 26.93 31.19 33.42 33.87 26.93 31.27 33.66 34.22 05-24 29.16 31.54 34.23 29.04 29.16 31.76 34.58 27.83 日最低气温
Daily minimum temperature
(℃)X5 X6 X7 X8 X5 X6 X7 X8 03-05 13.64 17.63 21.62 24.67 13.64 17.67 22.18 24.67 03-25 15.28 18.97 23.48 24.67 15.28 19.20 23.56 24.99 04-20 17.90 21.34 24.33 25.68 17.90 21.32 24.92 25.67 05-04 18.66 22.45 24.77 25.13 18.66 22.56 22.81 24.44 05-24 20.89 23.33 23.53 22.41 20.89 23.13 24.13 21.80 日平均气温
Average daily temperature
(℃)X9 X10 X11 X12 X9 X10 X11 X12 03-05 16.49 20.96 25.01 28.53 16.49 20.89 25.64 28.67 03-25 18.46 22.38 26.94 28.32 18.46 22.87 27.05 30.83 04-20 21.31 24.55 28.13 29.39 21.31 24.53 28.41 29.11 05-04 22.09 25.98 28.30 28.68 22.09 26.06 28.43 27.44 05-24 24.32 26.82 28.84 25.12 24.32 26.97 29.21 24.02 降水量
Amount of precipitation (mm)X13 X14 X15 X16 X13 X14 X15 X16 03-05 104.7 211.5 324.3 309.8 104.7 217.6 319.2 358.2 03-25 76.8 258.8 374.1 477.9 76.8 266.6 512.7 223.5 04-20 144.2 282.5 371.1 196.4 144.2 346.8 419.5 95.2 05-04 125.3 336.6 410.8 89.2 125.3 502.1 308.2 97.3 05-24 93.9 414.3 322.2 183.4 93.9 513.0 223.6 196.0 日平均
相对湿度
Daily average relative humidity
(%)X17 X18 X19 X20 X17 X18 X19 X20 03-05 81.08 81.84 82.54 81.48 81.08 81.94 82.30 81.18 03-25 81.68 81.07 84.23 82.88 81.68 81.06 84.97 81.82 04-20 81.24 82.35 82.31 79.12 81.24 82.91 82.24 77.19 05-04 80.35 81.38 83.15 76.74 80.35 82.53 82.57 79.15 05-24 78.44 84.13 81.00 84.26 78.44 84.06 79.78 86.69 日照时数
Sunshine duration
(h)X21 X22 X23 X24 X21 X22 X23 X24 03-05 108.3 180.8 189.1 218.0 108.3 190.7 206.4 212.9 03-25 97.5 246.8 166.9 241.1 97.5 270.2 175.9 230.8 04-20 127.8 180.8 232.2 206.7 127.8 195.0 253.4 195.4 05-04 93.0 259.5 181.0 200.8 93.0 274.9 214.2 153.1 05-24 119.9 177.4 265.2 121.2 119.9 200.6 273.4 93.3 ST: from sowing to transplanting; TJS: from transplanting to jointing stage; JSFS: from jointing stage to full heading stage; FSM: from full heading stage to maturity. 表 5 两个品种的稻米品质与气象因子的回归分析(2015-2016)
Table 5 Regression analysis between two varieties rice quality and meteorological factors (2015-2016)
品种
Variety回归方程
Regression equationF值
F valueR2 偏相关
Partial correlationt检验值
t test value旌优127
JY127y1=672.18-0.046 5X15-4.943 9X17-2.685 4X20-0.183 9X21 40.65** 0.970 2 r(y, X15)=-0.801 4 2.995 8* r(y, X17)=-0.966 5 8.423 5** r(y, X20)=-0.889 9 4.363 3** r(y, X21)=-0.695 8 2.166 2 y2=-48.06+2.471 2X3-3.365 6X7+0.010 5X16+0.741 4X18+0.065 0X23 26.64** 0.970 8 r(y, X3)=0.960 6 6.910 7** r(y, X7)=-0.967 6 7.667 1** r(y, X16)=0.959 9 6.847 5** r(y, X18)=0.956 5 6.559 0** r(y, X23)=0.944 5 5.749 2** y3=-122.38-1.615 0X9+0.070 2X14-3.150 1X17+2.100 3X19+2.834 8X20 69.21** 0.988 6 r(y, X9)=-0.962 4 7.081 1** r(y, X14)=0.976 3 9.021 5** r(y, X17)=-0.992 1 15.770 8** r(y, X19)=0.970 1 7.998 9** r(y, X20)=0.989 2 13.511 3** y4=1.41-0.000 8X15-0.001 1X16+0.035 1X19-0.002 6X21 14.22** 0.919 2 r(y, X15)=-0.854 5 3.678 9** r(y, X16)=-0.944 7 6.441 6** r(y, X19)=0.913 4 5.016 8** r(y, X21)=-0.901 9 4.668 2** y5=176.33-0.022 1X14-0.994 7X20-0.081 1X21-0.030 0X23 34.55** 0.965 1 r(y, X14)=-0.895 3 4.492 8** r(y, X20)=-0.954 3 7.141 0** r(y, X21)=-0.917 9 5.172 0** r(y, X23)=-0.835 3 3.397 7* y6=24.38-0.171 5X1+0.377 8X2-0.644 2X8-0.005 7X14 60.68** 0.979 8 r(y, X1)=-0.645 6 1.890 5 r(y, X2)=0.790 6 2.887 2* r(y, X8)=-0.978 7 10.655 5** r(y, X14)=-0.943 9 6.390 0** Ⅱ优602
ⅡY602y1=-68.01+8.049 7X5-0.144 9X14-0.056 1X15+0.103 0X22 38.21** 0.968 3 r(y, X5)=0.964 0 8.108 0** r(y, X14)=-0.966 8 8.458 7** r(y, X15)=-0.858 5 3.743 9** r(y, X22)=0.756 7 2.588 3* y2=267.37-2.651 3X6-10.501 7X7+0.047 4X22+0.204 7X23 55.61** 0.978 0 r(y, X6)=-0.941 3 6.234 9** r(y, X7)=-0.973 7 9.563 0** r(y, X22)=0.815 7 3.152 9* r(y, X23)=0.979 9 10.980 2** y3=188.08+14.160 6X3-9.610 3X7-7.264 8X8-9.207 1X9 24.52** 0.951 5 r(y, X3)=0.964 1 8.123 8** r(y, X7)=-0.855 9 3.700 7** r(y, X8)=-0.838 0 3.433 7** r(y, X9)=-0.929 3 5.624 2** y4=1.09+0.023 6X2-0.000 2X16+0.001 2X22+0.001 6X23 12.87** 0.911 5 r(y, X2)=0.778 7 2.775 5* r(y, X16)=-0.417 5 1.027 3 r(y, X22)=0.863 9 3.834 9** r(y, X23)=0.864 6 3.847 7** y5=344.80-1.787 5X11-0.287 7X13-1.030 7X19-1.676 4X20 234.24** 0.994 7 r(y, X11)=-0.932 7 5.780 9** r(y, X13)=-0.994 3 20.787 2** r(y, X19)=-0.958 2 7.491 8** r(y, X20)=-0.990 3 15.915 6** y6=23.96-0.317 2X3+0.453 8X6-0.005 6X14-0.006 6X21 76.09** 0.983 8 r(y, X3)=-0.935 3 5.909 7** r(y, X6)=0.984 4 12.513 7** r(y, X14)=-0.975 1 9.835 3** r(y, X21)=-0.836 0 3.407 3** 合计
Totaly1=248.97-13.612 0X3+11.451 0X7+4.299 6X9-1.332 4X17-0.183 5X24 41.99** 0.937 5 r(y, X3)=-0.923 8 9.030 4** r(y, X7)=0.730 0 3.997 0** r(y, X9)=0.716 3 3.841 3** r(y, X17)=-0.644 9 3.156 9** r(y, X24)=-0.578 7 2.654 9* y2=172.85+7.842 9X4-17.036 4X8-2.738 2X9+0.056 0X22+0.197 5X23 4.09* 0.693 6 r(y, X4)=0.522 2 2.291 0* r(y, X8)=-0.582 6 2.681 9* r(y, X9)=-0.563 9 2.555 1* r(y, X22)=0.399 5 1.630 3 r(y, X23)=0.739 4 4.108 7** y3=114.77-12.424 8X2+0.075 4X14+4.376 4X19+0.135 7X22-0.713 8X24 5.51** 0.662 9 r(y, X2)=-0.717 2 3.850 6** r(y, X14)=0.406 3 1.663 9 r(y, X19)=0.530 3 2.340 6* r(y, X22)=0.384 2 1.556 8 r(y, X24)=-0.825 3 4.332 2** y4=-3.40+1.372 0X2+0.611 6X9-1.945 8X10-0.006 8X22+0.014 6X24 7.37** 0.724 7 r(y, X2)=0.742 9 4.152 6** r(y, X9)=0.652 0 3.217 6** r(y, X10)=-0.731 6 4.015 5** r(y, X22)=-0.662 7 3.311 4** r(y, X24)=0.783 3 4.714 0** y5=-270.41+6.800 6X2-0.095 6X14+1.434 2X20-0.081 5X22+0.343 9X24 4.81** 0.632 2 r(y, X2)=0.617 8 2.939 5** r(y, X14)=-0.627 9 3.018 5** r(y, X20)=0.401 4 1.639 6 r(y, X22)=-0.341 6 1.359 9 r(y, X24)=0.666 3 3.343 0** y6=64.83-2.147 0X1-3.701 5X2+5.575 1X6+0.061 3X22-0.084 4X24 4.73** 0.628 1 r(y, X1)=-0.424 8 1.755 9 r(y, X2)=-0.577 2 2.644 6* r(y, X6)=0.624 0 2.988 1** r(y, X22)=0.670 4 3.380 9** r(y, X24)=-0.697 7 3.643 8** y与X含义见表 1和表 3。*和**分别表示可信度在0.05和0.01水平上显著。Meanings of y and X are shown in the table 1 and table 3. * and ** indicate the significant confidence at 0.05 and 0.01 levels, respectively. 表 6 两水稻品种产量穗粒结构与关键生育阶段气象因子(X)间的相关系数(2015-2016年)
Table 6 Correlation coefficients between panicle-spikelet structures of yield and key meteorological factors (X) of different growth stages of rice (2015-2016)
品种
Variety气象因子
Meteorological factor最高苗
Highest seedlings有效穗
Productive panicles number穗粒数
Spikelets per panicle结实率
Seed setting rate千粒重
1 000-grain weight旌优127
JY 127X1 -0.281 5 -0.243 7 -0.691 3* -0.360 2 -0.147 7 X2 -0.287 8 -0.330 7 -0.676 9* -0.393 8 -0.260 5 X3 -0.200 7 -0.022 9 -0.887 6** -0.641 1* -0.628 0* X4 -0.097 2 0.245 6 0.203 0 0.550 1 -0.202 7 X6 -0.292 4 -0.225 5 -0.669 0* -0.395 7 -0.205 3 X7 -0.259 5 -0.168 9 -0.708 6* -0.294 3 -0.410 6 X8 -0.173 2 0.200 0 0.082 1 0.404 1 -0.317 0 X9 -0.255 6 -0.244 2 -0.641 2* -0.431 1 -0.168 9 X10 -0.273 6 -0.255 5 -0.687 6* -0.411 1 -0.255 1 X14 0.148 1 0.061 5 -0.804 5** -0.696 3* -0.716 0* X17 0.489 9 0.211 5 -0.392 4 -0.445 5 -0.589 7 X19 0.334 4 0.489 8 -0.342 2 0.169 7 -0.406 0 X20 0.402 5 0.083 0 -0.201 3 -0.729 1* -0.020 3 X22 0.176 7 -0.217 9 0.092 3 0.016 6 -0.148 6 X23 -0.078 7 0.224 4 -0.818 7** -0.777 3** -0.632 7** X24 0.342 0 0.244 5 0.386 1 0.521 3 0.027 4 Ⅱ优602
Ⅱ Y602X1 -0.535 6 -0.573 1 -0.922 4** -0.136 3 -0.151 7 X2 -0.446 0 -0.491 2 -0.926 7** -0.191 5 -0.267 1 X3 -0.357 1 0.006 4 -0.866 2** -0.367 8 -0.249 3 X4 0.228 0 0.626 4* 0.617 1* 0.295 3 0.287 4 X6 -0.563 9 -0.583 9 -0.925 2** -0.057 2 -0.188 9 X7 -0.282 9 -0.146 7 -0.622 0* 0.025 6 -0.069 2 X8 0.214 9 0.673 0* 0.495 8 0.309 3 0.184 3 X9 -0.545 6 -0.574 2 -0.929 3** -0.165 5 -0.226 8 X10 -0.464 8 -0.541 3 -0.950 7** -0.138 5 -0.244 5 X14 -0.141 8 -0.089 9 -0.725 2* -0.475 6 -0.666 0* X17 0.309 7 0.326 2 -0.108 6 -0.163 7 -0.665 4* X19 0.532 7 0.277 9 0.573 6 0.232 0 0.166 2 X20 0.038 1 -0.370 9 -0.537 3 -0.625 2* -0.350 7 X22 0.304 8 0.039 0 0.290 6 0.067 8 0.243 4 X23 -0.251 7 0.216 0 -0.725 9* -0.496 4 -0.560 1 X24 0.513 1 0.458 5 0.765 9** 0.349 3 0.128 1 Xi含义见表 3。*和**表示相关性在0.05和0.01水平上显著。Meanings of Xi are shown in table 3。* and ** indicate the correlation are significant at level 0.05 and 0.01, respectively. -
[1] 程式华. 2016年中国水稻产业发展报告[M].北京:中国农业科学技术出版社, 2016:125-156 CHENG S H. The Chinese Rice Industry Development Report in 2016[M]. Beijing:China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, 2016:125-156
[2] 徐富贤, 熊洪.杂交水稻高产品种的库源结构与高产栽培[M].北京:中国农业科学技术出版社, 2015:1-19 XU F X, XIONG H. Sink-Source Structure of Hybrid Rice Varieties for High Yield and High Yield Cultivation[M]. Beijing:China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, 2015:1-19
[3] 徐富贤, 洪松.环境因素对稻米品质影响的研究进展[J].西南农业学报, 1994, 7(2):101-105 http://edu.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/Detail/mdjsfxyxb200404006 XU F X, HONG S. Review on effect of environmental factors on rice quality[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 1994, 7(2):101-105 http://edu.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/Detail/mdjsfxyxb200404006
[4] 吕文彦, 邵国军, 裴忠友, 等.辽宁省水稻品质兼及品质与产量关系的研究——Ⅳ.不同源库关系与稻米品质[J].辽宁农业科学, 2001, (2):1-4 http://industry.wanfangdata.com.cn/jt/Magazine?magazineId=lnnykx&yearIssue=2001_2 LYU W Y, SHAO G J, PEI Z Y, et al. Studies on the grain qualities and relationships between qualities and yields in rice of Liaoning Province-Ⅳ. The rice quality and the relationship among the nutritional source and sink[J]. Liaoning Agricultural Science, 2001, (2):1-4 http://industry.wanfangdata.com.cn/jt/Magazine?magazineId=lnnykx&yearIssue=2001_2
[5] 徐富贤, 郑家奎, 朱永川, 等.川东南高温伏旱区杂交中稻品种库源结构对稻米整精米率与垩白粒率的影响[J].作物学报, 2004, 30(5):432-437 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zuowxb200405005 XU F X, ZHENG J K, ZHU Y C, et al. Effect of ratio source to sink on percentage of head milled rice and chalky rice of combinations of mid-season hybrid rice in the south-east districts of Sichuan Province under high temperature and summer drought[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2004, 30(5):432-437 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zuowxb200405005
[6] 徐富贤, 张林, 熊洪, 等.川东南高温伏旱区杂交中稻组合的品质表现及产量与品质性状的关系[J].西南农业学报, 2016, 29(3):469-473 http://www.docin.com/p-25449187.html XU F X, ZHANG L, XIONG H, et al. Rice quality status and relationship between grain yield traits and quality traits in mid-season hybrid rice in high temperature and drought in summer districts in the eastern and southern of Sichuan Province[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 29(3):469-473 http://www.docin.com/p-25449187.html
[7] 徐富贤, 熊洪, 张林, 等.杂交中稻在不同地域和施氮水平下米质变异的影响因素及其预测模型[J].中国水稻科学, 2012, 26(4):438-444 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zgsdkx201204008 XU F X, XIONG H, ZHANG L, et al. Effect factor and predict model of rice quality variation for mid-season hybrid rice at different ecological sites and nitrogen application levels[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2012, 26(4):438-444 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zgsdkx201204008
[8] 王小珍, 张国勇, 潘明志.灌浆结实期气象因素对稻米品质的影响[J].中国稻米, 2004, (6):29-30 http://mall.cnki.net/magazine/Article/DAOM200406019.htm WANG X Z, ZHANG G Y, PAN M Z. Influence of weather on rice qualities in the most active ripening stage[J]. China Rice, 2004, (6):29-30 http://mall.cnki.net/magazine/Article/DAOM200406019.htm
[9] 程方民, 钟连进.不同气候生态条件下稻米品质性状的变异及主要影响因子分析[J].中国水稻科学, 2001, 15(3):187-191 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-XDNX200908086.htm CHENG F M, ZHONG L J. Variation of rice quality traits under different climate conditions and its main affected factors[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2001, 15(3):187-191 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-XDNX200908086.htm
[10] 胡群, 夏敏, 张洪程, 等.氮肥运筹对钵苗机插优质食味水稻产量及氮素吸收利用的影响[J].作物学报, 2016, 42(11):1666-1676 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-JSNY201410016.htm HU Q, XIA M, ZHANG H C, et al. Effect of nitrogen application regime on yield, nitrogen absorption and utilization of mechanical pot-seedling transplanting rice with good taste quality[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2016, 42(11):1666-1676 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-JSNY201410016.htm
[11] 胡群, 夏敏, 张洪程, 等.氮肥运筹对钵苗机插优质食味水稻产量及品质的影响[J].作物学报, 2017, 43(3):420-431 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-DAOM201301020.htm HU Q, XIA M, ZHANG H C, et al. Effect of nitrogen application regime on yield and quality of mechanical pot-seedlings transplanting rice with good taste quality[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2017, 43(3):420-431 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-DAOM201301020.htm
[12] 郭保卫, 朱大伟, 朱聪聪, 等.有序摆抛栽对粳型超级稻稻米品质的影响[J].作物学报, 2015, 41(3):487-498 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-ZGSK201501006.htm GUO B W, ZHU D W, ZHU C C, et al. Effect of ordered transplanting and optimized broadcasting on Japonica super rice quality[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2015, 41(3):487-498 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-ZGSK201501006.htm
[13] 田青兰, 李培程, 刘利, 等.四川不同生态区高产栽培条件下的杂交籼稻的稻米品质[J].作物学报, 2015, 41(8):1257-1268 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZWYF201104002.htm TIAN Q L, LI P C, LIU L, et al. Quality of Indica hybrid rice under the high-yield cultivation conditions in different ecological regions of Sichuan Province, China[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2015, 41(8):1257-1268 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZWYF201104002.htm
[14] 王小珍, 潘明志, 张国勇.不同群体质量对稻米品质的影响[J].中国稻米, 2004, (4):28-29 https://qikan.com.cn/article/xinm201112124.html WANG X Z, PAN M Z, ZHANG G Y. The effects of different population quality on rice quality[J]. China Rice, 2004, (4):28-29 https://qikan.com.cn/article/xinm201112124.html
[15] 徐富贤, 熊洪, 朱永川, 等.杂交中稻源库比对籽粒充实的影响及其高产组合的源库特征[J].中国农业科学, 2005, 38(2):265-271 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-ZJSD200904031.htm XU F X, XIONG H, ZHU Y C, et al. Effect of source-sink ratio on grain filling and the source-sink characteristics of high yield varieties of mid-season hybrid rice[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2005, 38(2):265-271 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-ZJSD200904031.htm
[16] 徐富贤, 熊洪, 朱永川, 等.强化栽培对杂交中稻籽粒充实度的影响及其与源库结构的关系[J].中国水稻科学, 2004, 18(6):522-526 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZJSD200304017.htm XU F X, XIONG H, ZHU Y C, et al. Effect of the system of rice intensification on grain plumpness in association with ratio of source to sink in mid-season hybrid rice[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2004, 18(6):522-526 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZJSD200304017.htm
[17] 徐富贤, 熊洪, 朱永川, 等.川东南高温伏旱区杂交中稻超稀栽培对稻米整精米率的影响与组合间库源结构的关系[J].植物生态学报, 2005, 29(5):829-835 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zwstxb200505018 XU F X, XIONG H, ZHU Y C, et al. The effects of cultivation density on the percent of head milled rice and source to sink ratios of mid-season hybrid rice in eastern and southern Sichuan Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2005, 29(5):829-835 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zwstxb200505018
[18] 徐富贤, 郑家奎, 朱永川, 等.灌浆期气象因子对杂交中籼稻米碾米品质和外观品质的影响[J].植物生态学报, 2003, 27(1):73-77 http://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/abstract/abstract3863.shtml XU F X, ZHENG J K, ZHU Y C, et al. Effect of atmospheric phenomena factors on the milling quality and the appearance quality of medium India hybrid rice during the period from full heading to maturity[J]. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 2003, 27(1):73-77 http://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/abstract/abstract3863.shtml
[19] 孙园园, 徐富贤, 孙永健, 等.四川稻作区优质稻生产气候生态条件适宜性评价及空间分布[J].中国生态农业学报, 2015, 23(4):506-513 http://www.ecoagri.ac.cn/zgstny/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=2015415&flag=1 SUN Y Y, XU F X, SUN Y J, et al. Suitability evaluation of eco-climatic conditions for high quality rice production in Sichuan Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-agriculture, 2015, 23(4):506-513 http://www.ecoagri.ac.cn/zgstny/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=2015415&flag=1
[20] 王娇, 王洁, 强爱玲, 等.北方不同气候条件对稻米品质性状的影响[J].中国稻米, 2015, 21(6):13-18 http://www.cqvip.com/qk/90168X/200303/8000737.html WANG J, WANG J, QIANG A L, et al. The Influence of different climatic ecological conditions on rice quality traits in northern China[J]. China Rice, 2015, 21(6):13-18 http://www.cqvip.com/qk/90168X/200303/8000737.html
[21] 高焕晔, 王三根, 宗学凤, 等.灌浆结实期高温干旱复合胁迫对稻米直链淀粉及蛋白质含量的影响[J].中国生态农业学报, 2012, 20(1):40-47 http://www.ecoagri.ac.cn/zgstny/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20120108&flag=1 GAO H Y, WANG S G, ZONG X F, et al. Effects of combined high temperature and drought stress on amylose and protein contents at rice grain-filling stage[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-agriculture, 2012, 20(1):40-47 http://www.ecoagri.ac.cn/zgstny/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20120108&flag=1