唐晓云, 闵庆文, 何露. 农业文化遗产地的旅游社会文化影响测量及调控研究-- 以广西桂林龙脊平安寨为例[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2012, 20(6): 710-716. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1011.2012.00710
引用本文: 唐晓云, 闵庆文, 何露. 农业文化遗产地的旅游社会文化影响测量及调控研究-- 以广西桂林龙脊平安寨为例[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2012, 20(6): 710-716. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1011.2012.00710
TANG Xiao-Yun, MIN Qing-Wen, HE Lu. Measurement and regulation of socio-cultural impact of tourism inagro-cultural heritage site- A cause study of Longji Ping'anzhai Terrace in Guilin, Guangxi[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2012, 20(6): 710-716. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1011.2012.00710
Citation: TANG Xiao-Yun, MIN Qing-Wen, HE Lu. Measurement and regulation of socio-cultural impact of tourism inagro-cultural heritage site- A cause study of Longji Ping'anzhai Terrace in Guilin, Guangxi[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2012, 20(6): 710-716. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1011.2012.00710

农业文化遗产地的旅游社会文化影响测量及调控研究-- 以广西桂林龙脊平安寨为例

Measurement and regulation of socio-cultural impact of tourism inagro-cultural heritage site- A cause study of Longji Ping'anzhai Terrace in Guilin, Guangxi

  • 摘要: 论文以稻作梯田农业文化遗产地—— 广西龙脊平安寨为个案, 采用田野调查、调查问卷和统计分析方法, 通过测算案例地居民对社会文化变化的态度值, 探讨了农业文化遗产地类型旅游地居民对旅游开发引起的社会文化变化的感知及其对旅游发展的影响。结果表明, 旅游开发使农业文化遗产地的社会文化发生较大变化, 且总体上呈正向发展。不同特征居民对社会文化的态度存在差异, 但总体上对变化持积极态度。家庭收入、旅游移民、社会治安、建筑服饰等文化因素的变化将直接影响居民对当地未来旅游发展的态度。只要能正确引导、调控和疏导其变化方向, 旅游地社会文化变化的负面影响可以减少乃至消除, 并促进旅游地更好的发展。论文还针对遗产旅游地的社会文化负面影响, 提出了针对各级政府管理部门及专业机构、旅游企业及投资商、旅游者和当地居民的社会文化影响调控建议。

     

    Abstract: There today exists a high level of awareness about the general impact of tourism on travel destinations and especially that of historical and cultural sports. This paper focused on resident perception of socio-cultural impacts of tourism using a case study of Ping’an Village, a rice-terrace agro-cultural heritage site in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region. This study investigated the atti-tudes of residents toward socio-cultural changes induced by tourism and discussed the relationship between resident perception of the changes and developments in tourism. Measurement indicators for the field investigation focused on three broad factors: social structure (including interpersonal relationship, tourism immigrants, etc.), social environment (moral effect, social security, etc.) and cultural structure (language, customs, traditional crafts, etc.). Based on local interviewee perceptions and preferences to tour-ism-induced socio-cultural changes in agro-cultural heritage sites and also on the depths of the interviews, questionnaires and statis-tical analyses, conclusions were drawn on resident attitudes toward the socio-cultural changes caused by tourism. Results showed that tourism development had great impacts on the socio-culture of agro-cultural heritage sites. These impacts were generally positive, such as increased family income, surge in tourism immigrants and better infrastructure. Resident attitudes toward tourism-induced socio-cultural changes varied in characteristics. In general, residents held positive attitudes toward these changes. Tourism-induced socio-cultural changes directly influenced local resident attitudes toward future developments in tourism. As long as correct guidance and regulation existed in the development of tourism, tourism-induced negative impacts on socio-cultural changes reduced or were even eliminated. This change promoted better developments in tourism related to agro-cultural heritage sites. In order to further re-gulate and control negative socio-cultural impacts of tourism on local residents, appropriate countermeasures and suggestions were put forward. For administrative departments and professional institutions, scientific planning was necessary to protect tourism sites via effective management and monitoring system. The media, tourism association and public institutions were the identified sectors that could effectively monitor the development of tourism. The education sector needed to strengthen the education and training of local residents for comprehensive understanding of socio-cultural impacts of tourism on their livelihoods. For the tourism enterprise and investors, there needed be more responsibility for the protection of local culture. The government also needed to establish man-agement regulations and services standards for tourism. Tourists needed to learn about local culture before entering valuable heritage sites. Tourist capacity also needed some attention and upgrade. It was as well necessary for local residents to comprehensively evalu-ate and understand developments in tourism, correctly deal with relations between the local communities and tourism development.

     

/

返回文章
返回