苌建峰, 董朋飞, 张海红, 张竞元, 李潮海. 行距配置方式对夏玉米氮素吸收利用及产量的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2016, 24(7): 853-863.
引用本文: 苌建峰, 董朋飞, 张海红, 张竞元, 李潮海. 行距配置方式对夏玉米氮素吸收利用及产量的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2016, 24(7): 853-863.
CHANG Jianfeng, DONG Pengfei, ZHANG Haihong, ZHANG Jingyuan, LI Chaohai. Effect of row spacing on nitrogen uptake, nitrogen utilization and yield of summer maize[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2016, 24(7): 853-863.
Citation: CHANG Jianfeng, DONG Pengfei, ZHANG Haihong, ZHANG Jingyuan, LI Chaohai. Effect of row spacing on nitrogen uptake, nitrogen utilization and yield of summer maize[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2016, 24(7): 853-863.

行距配置方式对夏玉米氮素吸收利用及产量的影响

Effect of row spacing on nitrogen uptake, nitrogen utilization and yield of summer maize

  • 摘要: 为确定黄淮南部夏玉米产区机械化生产适宜的行距配置方式, 2012—2013年同时在河南省方城县和辉县两个试验点设置大田试验, 以高、中、低3种株高类型的玉米杂交种‘先玉335’、‘郑单958’和‘512-4’为材料, 设置2个种植密度(低: 60 000 株·hm-2; 高: 75 000 株·hm-2)、5个行距配置方式(50 cm、60 cm、70 cm、80 cm等行距和80 cm+40 cm宽窄行距), 研究了不同株型玉米品种在不同密度和行距配置条件下对氮素吸收利用效率和产量的影响。结果显示, 低密度种植条件下, 高秆的‘XY335’和矮秆的‘512-4’均以60 cm等行距处理产量优势明显; 中秆的‘ZD958’在辉县和方城分别以60 cm和70 cm等行距产量最高。在高密度种植条件下, 高秆的‘XY335’和中秆的‘ZD958’均以60 cm等行距处理产量最高; 而矮秆的‘512-4’则以50 cm等行距种植产量优势明显, 但与60 cm等行距处理差异不显著。植株氮积累量随行距的扩大呈先升高后降低的趋势, 以60 cm等行距的氮积累量较大, 低密度时显著高于80 cm等行距和80 cm+40 cm宽窄行距处理, 而高密度下与各行距处理差异不显著; 不同品种植株氮积累量对行距反应不同, 高秆品种在行距间差异不显著, 中秆品种80 cm等行距最低且与其余行距处理差异显著, 矮秆品种50 cm和60 cm等行距氮积累量最高且与其余行距差异显著。两个密度种植条件下, 籽粒氮积累量和氮素收获指数均随行距的扩大先升高后降低, 在60 cm等行距处理达到最大值, 并且均显著高于其他行距处理; 氮肥偏生产力随行距的扩大呈现先升高后降低的趋势, 60 cm等行距处理较高, 但在低密度下与其他行距处理差异不显著, 高密度时与80 cm等行距处理差异显著。与其他行距处理相比, 60 cm等行距处理具有相对较高的氮素吸收利用效率和产量, 能够较好地协调玉米土壤与植株的氮素吸收利用关系, 兼顾不同株高类型玉米品种在一定密度范围内获得高产, 可作为目前黄淮南部地区夏玉米统一的行距配置方式进行推广。

     

    Abstract: To identify the row spacing suitable for mechanization of maize production in the south of Huanghuai maize region, field experiments were conducted at two experimental sites (Fangcheng and Huixian) in Henan Province in 2012 and 2013, respectively. Three varieties of hybrid maize with different plant heights (high — ‘Xianyu 335’, medium — ‘Zhengdan 958’ and dwarf — ‘512-4’) were planted under two planting densities (low density — 60 000 plants·hm-2 and high density — 75 000 plants·hm-2) and five row spacings (50 cm, 60 cm, 70 cm, 80 cm, and 80 cm + 40 cm) conditions. The study determined the effects of row spacing and planting density on nitrogen uptake, nitrogen utilization and yield of maize. The results showed that grain yield of both ‘Xianyu 335’ and ‘512-4’ with 60 cm row spacing was obviously higher than those of other row spacings. Also yield of medium height variety ‘Zhengdan 958’ with 60 cm and 70 cm row spacings was higher than that of others row spacings under low density treatments. The study also showed that under high plant density, grain yield of high-height variety ‘Xianyu 335’ and medium-height variety ‘Zhengdan 958’ with 60 cm row spacing was obviously the highest, followed by dwarf-height variety ‘512-4’ with 50 cm row spacing and treatments with other row spacings. Initially, plant nitrogen accumulation increased with increasing row spacing, reached peak level at 60 cm row spacing, and then decreased. Nitrogen accumulation in plant under 60 cm row spacing was significantly higher than that under 80 cm and 80 cm + 40 cm row spacings in low planting density treatment, while no significant difference among different row spacings under high planting density. Nitrogen accumulation in different maize varieties varied with different row spacings. As for high-height maize variety, nitrogen accumulation was not difference among different row spacings. For medium-height maize variety, nitrogen accumulation in plant of 80 cm row spacing was significantly decreased compared with that of other row spacings. However, nitrogen accumulation in plants of 50 cm and 60 cm row spacing were obviously higher than that of other row spacings. Seed nitrogen accumulation and nitrogen harvest index initially increased with increasing row spacing, reached the highest in 60 cm row spacing, and then decreased. Similarity, nitrogen partial factor productivity was increased firstly, and then decreased with increasing of row spacing, and it was significantly higher in 60 cm row spacing treatment than that in 80 cm row spacing under high density condition, but no obvious difference was found among different row spacings under low density conditions. Compared with other row spacings, nitrogen utilization efficiency and grain yield were relatively higher under 60 cm row spacing condition. In conclusion, 60 cm row spacing was the optimal planting pattern for summer maize in the south of Huanghuai maize region.

     

/

返回文章
返回