杨彩红, 柴强. 交替灌溉对小麦/蚕豆间作系统作物生理生态特性的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2016, 24(7): 883-892.
引用本文: 杨彩红, 柴强. 交替灌溉对小麦/蚕豆间作系统作物生理生态特性的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2016, 24(7): 883-892.
YANG Caihong, CHAI Qiang. Effects of alternative irrigation on eco-physiological characteristics of wheat/faba-bean intercropping[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2016, 24(7): 883-892.
Citation: YANG Caihong, CHAI Qiang. Effects of alternative irrigation on eco-physiological characteristics of wheat/faba-bean intercropping[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2016, 24(7): 883-892.

交替灌溉对小麦/蚕豆间作系统作物生理生态特性的影响

Effects of alternative irrigation on eco-physiological characteristics of wheat/faba-bean intercropping

  • 摘要: 为探明交替灌溉对小麦/蚕豆间作系统作物生理状况和生长发育的影响, 揭示交替灌溉的节水机理, 以小麦、蚕豆为材料, 采用根箱试验, 设置交替灌溉(A)、传统灌溉(T)2种灌溉方式和单作小麦(SW)、单作蚕豆(SF)、小麦间作蚕豆(IWF)3种种植模式, 于2008年3—11月在甘肃农业大学网室系统研究了交替灌溉对小麦/蚕豆间作作物叶片水分生理和生物量分配的影响。结果表明: 1)与传统灌溉相比, 交替灌溉条件下间作小麦、间作蚕豆叶片的叶绿素含量增加, 叶片相对含水量、叶水势等水分生理指标减小; 不同灌溉方式间小麦间作蚕豆生理特性差异不显著。不同种植模式之间, 间作显著增加了小麦和蚕豆叶片的叶绿素含量、叶片相对含水量和叶水势。2)交替灌溉小麦间作蚕豆在保持光合速率基本不变的情况下, 蒸腾速率、气孔导度降低, 与传统灌溉相比, 交替灌溉间作小麦蒸腾速率、气孔导度分别降低了10.99%、20.99%, 间作蚕豆分别降低6.66%、11.63%。3)与传统灌溉相比, 交替灌溉降低了作物的地上部干物质量, 增加了根冠比, 其中交替灌溉间作小麦和间作蚕豆的根冠比分别较传统灌溉提高14.47%和18.18%。4)间作有利于作物产量的提高, 交替灌溉和常规灌溉间作小麦的收获指数分别较相应单作增加8.68%和2.72%, 间作蚕豆分别较相应单作处理增加4.78%和5.23%。可见, 对小麦间作蚕豆实行交替灌溉, 可以调节光合产物在根冠间的分配, 优化根冠比, 是一种切实可行的灌溉方式。

     

    Abstract: Wheat/faba-bean strip intercropping is a common intercropping system in Northwest China, which has significantly contributed to food security and poverty alleviation. However, traditional net irrigation quota for wheat/faba-bean intercropping is relative higher, deepening the conflict between water resources supply and demand in agriculture. The alternating irrigation is a biological water-saving technique that is extensively used in agricultural production in arid and semi-arid areas, which is assumed to increase WUE and maintain high yield in wheat/faba-bean intercropping system. In order to determine the effects of alternating irrigation on physiology response and yield of wheat/faba-bean intercropping, a root box experiment was conducted in glass greenhouse condition in Gansu Agricultural University in 2008. The experiment had two irrigation methods alternating irrigation (A) and conventional irrigation (T) and three planting patterns sole wheat (SW), sole faba-bean (SF) and intercropped wheat/faba-bean (IWF). The results showed that leaf chlorophyll content of intercropped wheat and faba-bean increased under alternating irrigation condition. On the contrary, leaf relative water content and leaf water potential decreased compared with conventional irrigation treatment. However, there were no significant differences between the two irrigation methods for wheat intercropped with faba-bean. Leaf chlorophyll content and leaf water potential of intercropped wheat were higher than those of sole cropping. Also leaf chlorophyll content, leaf relative water content and leaf water potential of intercropped faba-bean were significantly higher than those of sole faba-bean. Compared with conventional irrigation treatment, transpiration rate and stomatal conductance reduced by 10.99% and 6.66%, respectively, in intercropped wheat leaves, and by 6.78% and 5.32%, respectively, in intercropped faba-bean leaves under alternating irrigation conditions. Thus leaf water use efficiency of wheat/faba-bean intercropping under alternating irrigation improved. Compared with conventional irrigation, shoot dry weight of sole wheat, sole faba-bean, intercropped wheat and intercropped faba-bean decreased, while root/shoot ratio significantly increased under alternating irrigation. The root/shoot ratio of sole wheat, sole faba-bean, intercropped wheat and intercropped faba-bean in alternating irrigation treatments were 14.47%, 7.56%, 36.36% and 19.63% higher than those of conventional irrigation, respectively. Compared with sole cropping, yield of intercropping treatments generally increased. The harvest indexes of intercropped wheat under alternating and conventional irrigation increased by 8.68% and 2.72% over those of corresponding sole wheat treatment, respectively. Also harvest index of intercropped faba-bean under alternating and conventional irrigation increased by 4.78% and 5.23% over those of the corresponding sole faba-bean treatment, respectively. In conclusion, wheat/faba-bean intercropping under alternating irrigation maintained high leaf water use efficiency of wheat and faba-bean by increasing root growth and root/shoot ratio. It significantly reduced excessive transpiration without much reduction in photosynthetic rate. The research suggested that wheat/faba-bean intercropping under alternating irrigation had the potential for the realization of high-quality and efficient irrigation.

     

/

返回文章
返回