LI Hui, YANG Shu-Hua, YAO Wen-Jing, WANG Si-Qi, YI Na, LIU Da-Bang. Evaluation of ecological conservation importance via GIS approach in the middle reaches of Nujiang watershed[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2011, 19(4): 947-953. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1011.2011.00947
Citation: LI Hui, YANG Shu-Hua, YAO Wen-Jing, WANG Si-Qi, YI Na, LIU Da-Bang. Evaluation of ecological conservation importance via GIS approach in the middle reaches of Nujiang watershed[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2011, 19(4): 947-953. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1011.2011.00947

Evaluation of ecological conservation importance via GIS approach in the middle reaches of Nujiang watershed

More Information
  • Received Date: 2010-10-14
  • Revised Date: 2011-04-28
  • Issue Publish Date: 2011-06-30
  • The importance of ecological conservation at regional level is reflected in the sustainability and protection of valuable/ fragile ecosystems. Several factors (e.g., soil erosion, eco-hydrological environment, stone desertification and geological disaster) influence ecological conservation. This paper used Geographic Information System (GIS) technology to build a combined multi- factor approach to evaluate ecological conservation. The approach combined one fold factor overlay method with logical reasoning method to formulate a comprehensive systems approach. The concept of ecological sensitivity was extended to ecological conservation importance, which is a critical factor of ecological conservation. The paper discussed the concept of importance of ecological conservation and evaluated the ecological conservation importance of the middle reaches of Nujiang watershed from soil erosion sensitivity and biodiversity. The results showed that the ecological conservation extremely important zone lied in the river valley region. This region was situated at an altitude over 1 300 m and covered 11.43% of the total studied area. The ecological conservation highly important zone covered about 48.02% of the studied area, and was at an altitude of 1 800~3 100 m. The ecological conservation moderately important zone was 35.22% of the studied area, located at an altitude of 3 100 m. The ecological conservation slightly important zone was small, accounting for 5.29% of the studied area, and with patched distribution. The ecological conservation unimportant zone was the smallest zone, covering only 0.04% of the total area and mainly distributed in residential areas. This evaluation work provided the basis for prioritizing ecological conservation efforts, with the main focus on ecological protection, recovery and construction.
  • [1]
    李晖, 白杨, 杨树华, 等. 基于马尔柯夫模型的怒江流域植被动态变化预测[J]. 生态学杂志, 2009, 28(2): 371-376
    [2]
    赵凯, 李晖, 朱雪. 基于生态安全格局的云南省福贡县间扩张研究[J]. 热带地理, 2008, 28(6): 529-533
    [3]
    董哲仁. 怒江水电开发的生态影响[J]. 生态学报, 2006, 26(5): 1591-1596
    [4]
    刘康, 欧阳志云, 王效科, 等. 甘肃省生态环境敏感性评其空间分布[J]. 生态学报, 2003, 23(12): 2711-2718
    [5]
    杨月圆, 王金亮, 杨丙丰. 云南省土地生态敏感性评价[J]. 生态学报, 2008, 28(5): 2253-2260
    [6]
    李东梅, 吴哓青, 于德永, 等. 云南省生态环境敏感性[J]. 生态学报, 2008, 28(11): 5270-5278
    [7]
    赵义华, 刘安生, 唐淑慧, 等. 基于生态敏感性分析的湿护开发利用规划——以常州市宋剑湖地区为例[J]. 城划, 2009(4): 84-87
    [8]
    朱查松, 罗震东, 胡继元. 基于生态敏感性分析的城市设用地划分研究[J]. 城市发展研究, 2008, 15(4): 40-45
    [9]
    程磊, 朱查松, 罗震东. 基于生态敏感性评价的城市非用地规划探讨——以南京市江宁区大连山-青龙山片念规划为例[J]. 规划师, 2009, 25(4): 63-66
    [10]
    徐卫华, 欧阳志云, 王学志, 等. 汶川地震重灾区生态保要性评价与对策[J]. 生态学报, 2008, 28(12): 5820-5825
    [11]
    Nunes J P, Seixas J. Impacts of extreme rainfall events on hydrological soil erosion patterns: Application to a Mediter ranean watershed[J]. World Resource Review, 2004, 15(3): 336-351
    [12]
    Cohen M J, Shepherd K D, Walsh M G. Empirical reformulation of the universal soil loss equation for erosion risk assessment in a tropical watershed[J]. Geoderma, 2005, 124(3/4): 235-252
    [13]
    Nearing M A, Jetten V, Baffaut C, et al. Modeling response of soil erosion and runoff to changes in precipitation and cover[ J]. Catena, 2005, 61(2/3): 131-154
    [14]
    Pan J J, Zhang T L, Zhao Q G. Dynamics of soil erosion in Xingguo County, China, determined using remote sensing and GIS[J]. Pedoshere, 2005, 15(3): 356-362
    [15]
    马琨, 王兆骞, 陈欣. 不同农业模式下水土流失的生态征研究[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2008, 16(1): 187-191
    [16]
    李斌, 张金屯. 不同植被盖度下的黄土高原土壤侵蚀特析[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2010, 18(2): 241-244
    [17]
    卜兆宏, 杨林章, 卜宇行, 等. 太湖流域苏皖汇流区土壤性K 值及其应用的研究[J]. 土壤学报, 2002, 39(3): 296-300
    [18]
    中国科学院生态环境研究中心. 生态功能区划暂行规程[S]. 北京: 国家环境保护总局, 2005
    [19]
    李月臣, 刘春霞, 赵纯勇, 等. 三峡库区(重庆段)土壤侵感性评价及其空间分异特征[J]. 生态学报, 2009, 29(2): 788-796
    [20]
    云南大学生态学与地植物学研究所. 云南省生态功能区究报告[R]. 2004: 52

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1947) PDF downloads (1356) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return